<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polemics &#187; Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polemics.us/polls/business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polemics.us</link>
	<description>Step Up and Take a Side</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:35:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Are Government Mandated Salary Caps Acceptable?</title>
		<link>http://www.polemics.us/are-government-mandated-salary-caps-acceptable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polemics.us/are-government-mandated-salary-caps-acceptable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feinberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay czar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polemics.us/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A second round of pay restrictions were handed today by the Obama Pay Czar, Kenneth Feinberg. The decision will effect hundreds of employees at the companies that accepted federal bailout money in 2009.
According to the CNN article, with very few exceptions, no employee will be paid more than $500,000 in &#8220;base compensation&#8221; this year in [...]<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/are-government-mandated-salary-caps-acceptable/">Are Government Mandated Salary Caps Acceptable?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A second round of pay restrictions were handed today by the <strong>Obama Pay Czar</strong>, Kenneth Feinberg. The decision will effect hundreds of employees at the companies that accepted federal bailout money in 2009.</p>
<p>According to the CNN article, with very few exceptions, no employee will be paid more than $500,000 in &#8220;base compensation&#8221; this year in cash and/or stocks.</p>
<p>It all begs the question&#8230; should the US Gov&#8217;t have any say-so in this matter, or should the companies prove fiscal responsibility and police themselves?</p>
<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/are-government-mandated-salary-caps-acceptable/">Are Government Mandated Salary Caps Acceptable?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polemics.us/are-government-mandated-salary-caps-acceptable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic Stimulus Plan &#8211; Is It Helping You?</title>
		<link>http://www.polemics.us/economic-stimulus-plan-is-it-helping-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polemics.us/economic-stimulus-plan-is-it-helping-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polemics.us/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the media focusing on whether or not there should be a second Stimulus plan &#8211; aka &#8211; spending bill, I thought it would be good to hear if the first one has helped anyone personally?
I help alot of folks with websites and such&#8230; the Realtors I help out have all said that the [...]<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/economic-stimulus-plan-is-it-helping-you/">Economic Stimulus Plan &#8211; Is It Helping You?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the media focusing on whether or not there should be a second Stimulus plan &#8211; aka &#8211; spending bill, I thought it would be good to hear if the first one has helped anyone personally?</p>
<p>I help alot of folks with websites and such&#8230; the Realtors I help out have all said that the situation with them is dire. People with great credit being turned away due to lack of a 30% down payment, etc.</p>
<h2>How has the Economic Stimulus Bill Helped You?</h2>
<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/economic-stimulus-plan-is-it-helping-you/">Economic Stimulus Plan &#8211; Is It Helping You?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polemics.us/economic-stimulus-plan-is-it-helping-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Credit Card Reform Help Ease the Economic Crisis?</title>
		<link>http://www.polemics.us/will-credit-card-reform-help-ease-the-economic-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polemics.us/will-credit-card-reform-help-ease-the-economic-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polemics.us/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama Administration has started looking into the credit card lenders and their less than friendly practice of reliving the fine print on credit card applications.
There appears to be a fairly narrow split on whether this is supported by consumers or not. Those on one side of the aisle say: You, the Consumer, should have [...]<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/will-credit-card-reform-help-ease-the-economic-crisis/">Will Credit Card Reform Help Ease the Economic Crisis?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama Administration has started <a href="http://www.titanium-drivers.com/admin/">looking into the credit card lenders</a> and their less than friendly practice of reliving the fine print on credit card applications.</p>
<p>There appears to be a fairly narrow split on whether this is supported by consumers or not. Those on one side of the aisle say: You, the Consumer, should have read the print a bit further and known ahead of time how your personal credit would be effected if certain conditions occur. Over on the other side, people are crying foul play from the credit card companies with all sorts of horror stories about accounts being closed, rates doubling after 1 late payment etc.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/will-credit-card-reform-help-ease-the-economic-crisis/">Will Credit Card Reform Help Ease the Economic Crisis?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polemics.us/will-credit-card-reform-help-ease-the-economic-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the US $ Dollar on the Verge of Collapse?</title>
		<link>http://www.polemics.us/is-the-us-dollar-on-the-verge-of-collapse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polemics.us/is-the-us-dollar-on-the-verge-of-collapse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polemics.us/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should we be surprised if the US Dollar Fails soon! It has been devalued and not worth the paper beneath the print.
Do you think the Dollar will Collapse?
Debate it Yourself at Polemics
Is the US $ Dollar on the Verge of Collapse?
<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/is-the-us-dollar-on-the-verge-of-collapse/">Is the US $ Dollar on the Verge of Collapse?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should we be surprised if the US Dollar Fails soon! It has been devalued and not worth the paper beneath the print.</p>
<p>Do you think the Dollar will Collapse?</p>
<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/is-the-us-dollar-on-the-verge-of-collapse/">Is the US $ Dollar on the Verge of Collapse?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polemics.us/is-the-us-dollar-on-the-verge-of-collapse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamas Foreclosure Plan &#8211; I Will Pay for Your Home!</title>
		<link>http://www.polemics.us/obamas-foreclosure-plan-i-will-pay-for-your-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polemics.us/obamas-foreclosure-plan-i-will-pay-for-your-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failing banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage inductry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama foreclosure plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayer subsidies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polemics.us/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, President Obama is planning to release an all new Foreclosure Plan, designed to help stem the flooding of foreclosures and bankruptcies in this struggling economy. According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, there was a record number 2.3 million home foreclosures in the US. That figure is more than double the volume from 2006 [...]<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/obamas-foreclosure-plan-i-will-pay-for-your-home/">Obamas Foreclosure Plan &#8211; I Will Pay for Your Home!</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, President Obama is planning to release an all new Foreclosure Plan, designed to help stem the flooding of foreclosures and bankruptcies in this struggling economy. According to the <a href="http://www.mbaa.org">Mortgage Bankers Association</a>, there was a record number 2.3 million home foreclosures in the US. That figure is more than double the volume from 2006 and key indicators show it is only going to worsen, much sooner than it will ever turn around!</p>
<h2>A Few Keys to the New Obama Foreclosure Plan</h2>
<p>One of the most important and likely positive keys to the new foreclosure plan, is that our <strong>Government will subsidize mortgage payments</strong> along with the banks who own your note! That&#8217;s right&#8230; Along with a reduced interest rate, the lenders will be asked to kick in a little toward your house payment and the taxpayers will match the same amount!</p>
<p>Along with the newly subsidized mortgages, the Obama Foreclosure Plan also calls for a <strong>Restructuring of the Current Bankruptcy Laws</strong>, allowing the Judge to modify your mortgage on the fly and be excluded from the settlement! Under current laws, once you file for bankruptcy protection, your home loan cannot be modified! As you can imagine, banks and lenders are not too keen about this idea, since homeowners can realistically just go broke, and not be held liable to their obligations!</p>
<h2>What do You Think about the New Foreclosure Plan?</h2>
<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/obamas-foreclosure-plan-i-will-pay-for-your-home/">Obamas Foreclosure Plan &#8211; I Will Pay for Your Home!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polemics.us/obamas-foreclosure-plan-i-will-pay-for-your-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Retail Stores &#8211; Would You Go There?</title>
		<link>http://www.polemics.us/microsoft-retail-stores-talk-about-wasteful-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polemics.us/microsoft-retail-stores-talk-about-wasteful-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polemics.us/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, Microsoft announced plans to open retail stores around the US and the rest of the world! Speculation is, they are doing this to try the same method that has been working very well for Apple, and get a company certified professional in a face to face situation with buyers. Coming from several [...]<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/microsoft-retail-stores-talk-about-wasteful-spending/">Microsoft Retail Stores &#8211; Would You Go There?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/operatingsystems/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=214000814&amp;subSection=All+Stories">Microsoft announced plans</a> to open retail stores around the US and the rest of the world! Speculation is, they are doing this to try the same method that has been working very well for Apple, and get a company certified professional in a face to face situation with buyers. Coming from several years in retail with Gateway Country Stores, the now closed retail chain from Gateway Computers Inc, I don&#8217;t think they have given this enough thought! <img src='http://www.polemics.us/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<h2>Why It Might Work</h2>
<p>Microsoft still holds a very large percentage of the home computer market and many people use their software daily! If they position the <strong>Microsoft Retail outlets</strong> as a service and training company versus a retail software chain, they have a much better chance of reaching people and business. They can load the store with their software of course, but having consumer techs and more importantly, small business solution technicians in place to not only assist with issues, but helping people envision HOW the software will benefit them, they might just make it work!</p>
<p>It has been my own experience in 15 years of working around the PC, 99% of the problems people experience are user or training related. If they meet that need, they might have something!</p>
<h2>Why it Won&#8217;t Work</h2>
<p>It will be easier to complete this section, since IMO, this is going to be a HUGE money pit from day 1! <strong>Microsoft Retail Stores</strong>&#8230; what are they going to actually sell? Operating systems? Office Software? Of course&#8230; BUT what makes them any different than your neighborhood Best Buy or Online Discount seller? Unless they align themselves with a hardware manufacturer that is NOT already present in the warehouse stores, why bother going there?</p>
<p>Why would you visit a Microsoft Retail Store that offers 1-2 products, versus going to Best Buy with hundreds?</p>
<h2>Do YOU Think it will Work?</h2>
<p>Vote in the Poll and leave your Comments below!</p>
<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/microsoft-retail-stores-talk-about-wasteful-spending/">Microsoft Retail Stores &#8211; Would You Go There?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polemics.us/microsoft-retail-stores-talk-about-wasteful-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citibank Plane Crashes Under Pressure from Obama Administration!</title>
		<link>http://www.polemics.us/citibank-plane-crashes-under-pressure-from-obama-administration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polemics.us/citibank-plane-crashes-under-pressure-from-obama-administration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polemics.us/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As mentioned earlier this week, the CitiBank purchase of a $50 Million Dollar Corporate Jet, was drawing quite a bit of unwelcome attention! At the Huffington Post this morning, it looks like the Obama Administration took notice and Told Citibank to Ditch the Plane Plans, as it sends the wrong message to taxpayers!
Lets Welcome the [...]<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/citibank-plane-crashes-under-pressure-from-obama-administration/">Citibank Plane Crashes Under Pressure from Obama Administration!</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://www.polemics.us/when-government-oversight-becomes-a-risky-proposition/">mentioned earlier this week</a>, the CitiBank purchase of a $50 Million Dollar Corporate Jet, was drawing quite a bit of unwelcome attention! At the Huffington Post this morning, it looks like the Obama Administration took notice and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/27/obama-officials-tells-cit_n_161202.html">Told Citibank to Ditch the Plane Plans</a>, as it sends the wrong message to taxpayers!</p>
<h3>Lets Welcome the US Government into our Homes</h3>
<p>Sure, this may be the first example of the Obama administration standing up to corporate powerhouses and flexing its muscle, but what if they don&#8217;t stop there? What if they start telling every business or Individual who receive some form of federal support, how to run their own ships? Do they have the right? Do we really want them to?</p>
<p>After they see they can dictate how businesses run&#8230; you can bet they will be in our homes, criticizing our household spending next!</p>
<h3>What do you think about this new Government Control?</h3>
<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/citibank-plane-crashes-under-pressure-from-obama-administration/">Citibank Plane Crashes Under Pressure from Obama Administration!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polemics.us/citibank-plane-crashes-under-pressure-from-obama-administration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Government Oversight becomes a Risky Proposition!</title>
		<link>http://www.polemics.us/when-government-oversight-becomes-a-risky-proposition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.polemics.us/when-government-oversight-becomes-a-risky-proposition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polemics.us/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reports leaked out yesterday about the Citigroup purchase of a $50 million dollar Dassault Falcon corporate jet, after receiving more than $45 billion dollars of taxpayer funding from the TARP bailout. Even though this purchase has been in the works for more than 2 years and Citigroup is selling two of their older jets to [...]<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/when-government-oversight-becomes-a-risky-proposition/">When Government Oversight becomes a Risky Proposition!</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reports leaked out yesterday about the <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/01262009/news/nationalnews/just_plane_despicable_152033.htm">Citigroup purchase</a> of a $50 million dollar Dassault Falcon corporate jet, after receiving more than $45 billion dollars of taxpayer funding from the TARP bailout. Even though this purchase has been in the works for more than 2 years and Citigroup is selling two of their older jets to pay for the new purchase, many are howling for more oversight from the US Government.</p>
<p><strong>This leads to a risky proposition of Government oversight&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>How much do we really want our Govt looking in to the finances and spending practices of those who receive bailout funds? After all, there are many past, present, and future bailouts in the works, and just as we are calling on oversight for the businesses receiving funding, what if we make too much noise, and they also want to scrutinize how WE spend funds given to us!</p>
<ul>
<li>In February 2008, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_Stimulus_Act_of_2008">Federal Economic Stimulus Act</a> put approximately $152 Billion back into taxpayer pockets.</li>
<li>President Obama is currently proposing another stimulus check for taxpayers.</li>
</ul>
<p>This all leads to a question on whether or not we as citizens, are also willing to have our own finances scrutinized! Lets face it, the Government gave US money also&#8230; are we willing to let then into our homes, and look at every penny we spend?!</p>
<h3><strong>What&#8217;s your opinion?</strong></h3>
<p>Debate it Yourself at <a href="http://www.polemics.us">Polemics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.polemics.us/when-government-oversight-becomes-a-risky-proposition/">When Government Oversight becomes a Risky Proposition!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.polemics.us/when-government-oversight-becomes-a-risky-proposition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.238 seconds -->
